• Posted on July 12, 2024
  • by MI2 Research

“What is the appropriate inflation target?”

While the Whitehouse may have successfully avoided putting its foot in its mouth on inflation this year (We hope everyone stateside had a good Independence day), the topic remains at top of mind for more than just the bean counters, as policymakers and consumers alike grapple with a new version of Whitney Houston’s question, “How will I know if inflation is over?”. The last few weeks haven’t offered very clear guidance. CPI was cooler than expected, but PPI was above expectations. Both the ISM Manufacturing and Services reports saw strong price readings, but there were other signs of a retreat in demand. Goods inflation would seem to be augured by the continuing rise in shipping costs (compare the smooth ski jump of the Drewry World Container Index against the whipsaw-filled march of the Baltic Dry Index). And yet… this week saw the release of a few earnings reports that continued to support the idea that the consumer is starting to demand cheaper prices (if you’ll pardon the pun). Pepsi said that “consumers have become more value-conscious with their spending patterns and preferences” and Delta airlines is learning that if you build it, they will come, but perhaps not at the price you were hoping for.

However, it’s service inflation that appears to be the source of the most worry, see Powell’s past comments about a dreaded wage-price spiral. Stateside, things seem to be well in hand. Powell noted in his testimony before Congress that the Fed has made “considerable progress” toward defeating inflation, adding the job market has “cooled considerably”, enough so that it “is not a source of broad inflationary pressures for the economy”. However, across the pond, things aren’t quite as rosy. Huw Pill reminded the UK of the uncomfortable truth of service inflation where “the rise in services prices, coupled with similarly rapid rises in wages, were signs of uncomfortable strength in underlying inflation”. And this is while “inflation has fallen to the BoE’s target for now”. The article added the caveat that “the decline since the middle of 2023 has been driven primarily by energy prices, which have tumbled on global markets”. Another member of the BoE’s Monetary Policy committee indicated “he would continue to vote against a rate cut”, supporting the article’s conclusion that “Policymakers at the BoE worry that when they [, energy prices,] level out, overall inflation will be driven higher by prices that are mainly responding to domestic pressures, including rapidly rising wages”. See Bernanke and Blanchard’s paper from last year: “Controlling inflation will… ultimately require achieving a better balance between demand and labor supply”.

https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1992/05/23

P.S. Despite warnings from its Central Bank, Ireland’s new budget will be increasing “public expenditures by 6.9% in 2025, again breaking the government’s own budget rule”. “The 8.3 billion euro ($8.9 billion) package was far ahead of the 5.7 billion euro assumed a year ago and will allow ministers to cut tax and increase spending in October, ahead of an election that analysts expect in November.” It is perhaps worth noting that Ireland runs a hefty surplus “entirely driven by booming corporate tax receipts paid by Ireland’s hub of large multinationals”.

Other posts

Thoughts From The Divide: Natural Disasters?

BY JON WEBB
One might have expected yesterday’s CPI data to be of significance for asset prices. As it happened the figures were interesting, with the inflation data surprising to the high side: marginally, but still a miss, while core CPI actually increased for the 2nd month. Hardly proof of resurgent inflation but notable in the context of a series which has been trending lower since Sep 2022. But asset prices didn’t seem to notice the miss. Perhaps that’s because policymakers hardly noticed it either. The quote above came from the NY Fed Williams yesterday, and seems to be representative of policymakers’ focus shifting from inflation to the labor market. So perhaps markets took that cue and paid more attention to the rather striking weekly claims figure (258k). Read more →

Thoughts From The Divide: Adjustments

BY JON WEBB
Last week’s excitement in bond markets came courtesy of Governor Waller offering a mechanical rationale for rate cuts. Simply, “If inflation goes down, you would lower the policy rate.” This came, of course, in the context of warnings about financial conditions and other caveats, but as is so often the case, what the markets heard was “so you’re telling me there’s a chance?”. That doesn’t mean that we disagree with the market’s read of where the Fed’s head is. Fed Governors don’t make too many boo-boos with their messaging, and when they do, it’s often an error of timing rather than content. The market has now priced cuts down to “around 4% by the end of 2024” and while that seems perhaps overdoing the enthusiasm a tad, we suspect that the market has gotten the gist about right.  Read more →

Thoughts From the Divide: The (Golden) Path

BY JON WEBB
While the road to hell is paved with good intentions, it appears that the “golden path” to a soft landing (which by way of reminder is a “triumph of hope over experience”, if you ask Mr. Summers) is paved with rate cuts. In an interview earlier this week, the Chicago Fed president Austan Goolsbee cast another vote in favor of “adjustment cuts”, saying that “You risk the golden path if you are going to be as restrictive as we are now”. Meanwhile, Jerome Powell was quick to assure the audience during his latest interview that “today I am not going to be sending any signals, one way or the other on any particular meeting” as far as rate cuts are concerned. However, that did not prevent the Chair from referring to ol’ reliable of monetary policy, “long and variable lags”, to explain why, “if you wait until inflation gets all the way down to 2%, you’ve probably waited too long”. Read more →
Back to all posts →