• Posted on October 18, 2024
  • by MI2 Research

“I actually think we’re going to see inflation be choppy, and I expect that we’ll see employment stay robust.”

As we noted back in May, “one swallow does not make spring”. But if we are to follow the advice of Keynes/Samuelson, when information changes, we should adjust our conclusions. Blast! The trick is, of course, balancing the two ideas to adjust conclusions when the evidence suggests such an adjustment is appropriate: you might call it Bayesian inference. The above quote from Bostic illustrates the problem, with the Atlanta Fed head implicitly stating that he will be ignoring any hot inflation prints. All of this is made even more complicated by the near-constant adjustments to the data (made worse by complicating factors such as hurricanes). Take, for example, the recent adjustment of GDI, which seemingly reverses the previous “understanding” that the consumer is tapped out. Today’s Retail Sales data suggested a rosier view of the consumer.

Another adjustment we have recently noticed is the shift in the economic narrative. We have been prone to joking about the tendency of “economic experts” to argue against the consumer/voter perspective regarding inflation and other economic realities, repeatedly asking the question, “who are you going believe, me or your own eyes”? It turns out there may be limits to the effectiveness of gaslighting. Adam Tooze, a leading voice on “team transitory”, recently wrote about his “cognitive dissonance” in bridging his “sophisticated social constructivist” (our apologies to anyone who may be reading this while eating or drinking) view on inflation with his own lived experience. It seems the inflation numbers “aren’t capturing our reality”. He goes on to discuss how the data could better capture the inflation consumers feel but concludes that there may be a better way to communicate economic policy than telling people that they are wrong. What a thought!

https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1994/09/27

P.S. While the details are scant, JPM “selling a significant risk transfer linked to a portfolio of about $3 billion in net asset value loans” doesn’t inspire optimism.

And finally…. Something new is coming from MI2.

As the world of macro research evolves, so do we! This November, MI2 is launching something new, specifically designed for individual investors, to help you navigate markets with greater precision and confidence. You’ll get more macro analysis, actionable trade ideas, and live interaction with Julian and the MI2 team. Stay tuned for more details!

Other posts

Thoughts From The Divide: If Then

BY JON WEBB
With another “most important Fed meeting of our lifetime” squarely in the rearview, and the first round of knee-jerk market moves pass to the side mirrors, it’s worth reflecting a little on the Fed Chair Powell’s “works”. The “biggest” move was the announced tapering of treasuries QT to roughly $25b from the previous rate of $60b of run off a month, but beyond that Fed confidence was conspicuous by its absence. The Chairman stated as much, admitting that “the data have not given us that greater confidence” that inflation was moving toward the 2% goal that Powell indicated necessary (how long is a piece of string?) for cuts. Read more →

C8 Currency Compass – “Don’t be a PANICAN” Pres Trump – April 2025

BY JON WEBB
After the tariff announcement, there was an initial USD drop on the risk that the US finds itself isolated, then a flight to the USD on risk aversion.  Interestingly, our FX models, which have been bearish on the USD since the start of January, are broadly positive USD for April.  In particular, reversing to short positions in AUD and NZD, which as commodity producers are most impacted by increasing recession risks. In the medium term, the USD remains vulnerable, with a weaker USD seemingly a policy goal for the Administration, but, as the shock of the tariff announcements work through the markets, the USD can have a period of strength first. Read more →

Thoughts From The Divide: Regrets

BY JON WEBB
With the Fed in blackout, the market has been left to its own devices to digest this week’s onslaught of economic data. The inflation data was particularly indigestible. CPI numbers came in hotter than expectations, with both Core and Headline higher than forecasts on a YoY basis at 3.8% and 3.2%, respectively: only slightly worse than expected, but worse than expected. The market also had to deal with PPI that was substantially hotter than expected: the month on month came in at 0.6%, double the consensus forecast. Under the surface, goods inflation appeared to once again be rearing its head, accounting for “about two-thirds of the rise in the headline PPI”, courtesy of “a 1.2% surge in goods prices, the biggest increase since August 2023”. (The Houthis are not helping). While the Fed may have taken a temporary vow of silence, Yellen is under no such constraint. Speaking in an interview on Fox, the Treasury secretary said, “I regret saying it, [inflation,] was transitory”, following up with the jab that “I think transitory means a few weeks or months to most people” (how long is a piece of string? To be fair, predicting inflation is, apparently, tricky: “there are clear limitations to how far into the future we can forecast inflation”). Read more →
Back to all posts →