https://www.delftpartners.com/news/views/some-stuff-you-dont-want-to-think-about-but-should.html

Or Risk is the independent variable and Return, the dependent one.

Ever been on a car journey as a passenger where the driver was going too fast; being reckless; and essentially taking chances? Over and under-taking, switching lanes without looking, going too fast and braking too hard. We all have. It’s not so pleasant especially as you get older and realise how much is at risk from a needless mistake: your health, your life even; the realisation that family members depend on you staying healthy and not becoming a burden; your enjoyment from their growing old.

So, we try to avoid such a scenario. It’s relatively easy since reckless driving is usually associated with inexperienced younger members of society in fast cars. So, we can avoid such journeys as being readily identifiable in advance.

And yet we often find that a similar journey, multi-generational wealth investing, has older wealthy members indifferent to risk and unaware of the loss of wealth that occurs when insufficient attention is paid to the risk path taken by their managers.

Investing is not so different from a car journey? It’s a path to an end point with risk to be managed; speed, comfort, time horizon all matter for investing as much as they do for being driven. Better to get to the end point safely and aware of risks on the way, and how to drive defensively at such times, than to get there at speed dangerously?

And yet here we are, perhaps caused by years of unorthodox monetary policy, where many managers and clients perceive risk as irrelevant and an irritant? All focus is upon return – those ‘sexy’ growth stocks, that 10 bagger PE fund, that property that will inevitably benefit from a lick of paint or a change of use permission, and of course the free put option available to all investors that has been a feature of monetary policy in essentially the last 25 years.

So we’re going to bore you with a brief article on the independent variable known as risk. Return, the glamourous bit, is the dependent variable. No risk, no return. So, if you can’t define, measure, and manage risk then your returns are a function of luck. Not a lot of people know that.

We spend a lot of time obsessing about risk especially in multi-asset portfolios, whose Alphas and Betas are both correlated at different extents at different times, and where they offer differing opportunities for active and passive approaches at different times.

Other posts

Day Hagan/NDR Smart Sector® with Catastrophic Stop Strategy November 2022 Update

BY BRIAN SANBORN
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector® with Catastrophic Stop strategy, model and allocations update. Read more →

Thoughts From The Divide: Tricks

BY JON WEBB
Perhaps it’s just us, but as the spooky season returns and jack-o-lanterns bedeck porches, we notice that markets and commentators also seem a bit skittish. Maybe it’s the looming election, or perhaps the geopolitical horror shows, but folk seem surprisingly easy to spook. Case in point was the hullabaloo around the $44bn jump in US (government) debt. The hue and cry of folk such as ZeroHedge were enough to get more mainstream interest, including the owner of X and a son of FP Trump, to take notice. The jump is seasonal, as Constan and others pointed out, rather than some ghoulish trick, but of course it’s easy to make fun of those who took fright. But perhaps this misses the point about horror movies. Some argue that the genre works for some because it allows them to push their boundaries and learn the limits of their fears. If that describes you, we recommend reading the CBO Long-Term Budget Outlook. For others, referred to as “dark copers”, the appeal of horror movies might lie in “anxiety or fear that they’re feeling in their life, and they use scary genres like horror to kind of work through those feelings”. Read more →

MI2 Partners Thoughts From The Divide: Never Rains But It Pours

BY JON WEBB
t’s been a challenging week for President Trump. The problems started when the Justice Department released a memo as part of their “commitment to transparency” that explained there was no evidence of an “Epstein client list” or that his death was suspicious. Trump offered a spirited defence of AG Pam Bondi, but this did little to placate the MAGA base, who appeared understandably sceptical. Reports that China believes it has the whip hand in trade negotiations because of its rare earth leverage can’t have improved the President’s mood. Worse still, there does seem to be substance to those reports. One poker tell was the recently announced deal between MP Materials and Apple, which will invest $500mn in rare earth magnets and a recycling facility (of course). That news followed last week’s announcement of a $400mn investment in MP by the Pentagon, no less! Trump then managed to go 0 for 3 when he ostensibly floated a trial balloon on firing Powell. The market reaction prompted a swift walk-back. Read more →
Back to all posts →